I am actually reading it. I'm nearly done. I had to force myself to take a break from my endless war doomscrolling.

I had zero expectations about the article but it actually was a bit better than I expected. It's not a puff piece at all. In fact - I bet it will make Kamala and her hive angry. What strikes me about the text is that it's just like every single thing I've read about her. It's devoid of details about what she actually believes and how she wants to get stuff accomplished. Her entire focus seems to be herself.

Like other articles it's full of drama and it covers her unyielding, abrasive attitude which in person I assume must like Hillary's "It's my turn" mindset. Here's a typical example in the writer's careful, politic phrasing. He doesn't say she got angry and stormed out of the room but it certainly seems that way to me.

In Chicago, I directly placed in front of her the question others had only insinuated.

"When someone asks, 'What does Vice President Kamala Harris bring to the ticket?' what is that clear answer?" I asked. Her team made clear it would be my final question.

"Were you in this room of 2,000 people?" she asked. I nodded.

"Did you see them cheering and standing?"

"Yes."

"That's what I say."

She stood up and walked out of the room.

I assume Kamala is no joy to be around. Because not only does she go through staff like a hot knife like butter after they leave they never seem to go on the record and talk about her. I assume that at best they don't like her but I think many of them actually hate her. I wonder what Symone Sanders-Townsend thinks of Kamala. It can't be anything good or even neutral.

The New York Post published a tally of Harris's staff departures — 13 within 13 months. They included members of the advance team, her longtime policy adviser, her first chief of staff and her high-profile press secretary, Symone Sanders-Townsend, who now hosts a show on MSNBC. (Harris has yet to appear.)