1367
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I go to China for business fairly often and there is this one area where the government decided a new subway line should be installed, so I watched it get built over several trips. The property owners in the way were, as far as I understand it, booted off the land but compensated. And boom. A year later the subway line was done and hooked up to the rest of the existing subway infrastructure with completed stations, entries/exits, and even retail shops in the stations. It blew my mind.

The city definitely needed the subway line, but I was amazed at the efficiency. In my American home town that idea's been debated for decades and is yet to be finished because at first it was getting voted against and then finally after the public supported and approved it, the NIMBY experience began and it took a decade of land use planning to choose the route. If it actually runs efficiently before the 2020's are finished I'll be impressed.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

iirc. in China property is not owned but leased from the state. That makes it easier legally to get people away.

On the other hand in the alledgly property protecting and valueing democracies in Europe it is no problem to kick people off their land to build highways and expand lignite mines.

[-] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not quite. The way property is leased is such that you can indefinitely renew it for free until you are dead. The standard base lease is 70 years so you'll probably never run into problems. Even if you do exceed it it's simply showing up at an administrative location and talking to a clerk.

This came up about a decade ago since a bunch of people were panicking about their properties due to some older houses having only 20 years leases. The government then clarified that the difference is the management of the property (e.g. apartment complex) goes from the developer to the government at the end of the lease. Nothing else can force individual buyers out (except for "illegal" housing modifications).

In reality, when public works require demolishion, the government usually provides substitute housing instead of money. My understanding is that most people take the new house/apartment since they are actually new (less than 3 years old), in nice locations (most I've seen are near bus stops/subway stations with reasonable school districts and nearby supermarkets), and worth more than their old place. That being said Asian societal pressure definitely is a thing. So even if you don't want the new property you'll probably take it just to avoid the side eye.

Source: lived in Shanghai for 16 years. Still have my name on a deed somewhere.

[-] ferralcat 4 points 1 year ago

I see this in Thailand too. Lived in the bay for a decade. There's posters in every bart showing the future and expansion of it. Afaik, none ever happened.

In Bangkok I see a few new stations open every year basically.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1367 points (93.3% liked)

solarpunk memes

2918 readers
777 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS