1193
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

This is true. But it is also because there isn't a much better alternative.

The Palestinians don't have a Nelson Mandela, MLK or Mahatma Gandhi kind of person that the western world can rally around and support.

Like, I'm sitting here at home in Europe, thoroughly disapproving of Israel, while being also fully disgusted by what Hamas did.

And I understand why Palestinians fight. I can understand that they can't be fully pacifist and that they don't have the capability to wage a normal war, so they result to asymmetric warfare.

But if they had just cleanly killed or kidnapped the adults and spared the children, that would have been the minimum to not fully alienate a lot of people who are sympathetic to their cause.

I guess Yasser Arafat was the best they had and it only went downhill after that.

[-] Cerbero@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Thing also is that those people were also hated during thier time and also called terrorists. There’s no good options for a leader sadly.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

But Hamas does very textbook terrorist things, seems to me like they are actually terrorists.

[-] Eikichi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

As opposed to the resistants (including many Jews) during WW2 who were literally called terrorists by Nazis ?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
1193 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32327 readers
775 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS