479
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

And everyone is afraid of immigration. It's bizarre.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] hh93@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Fuck you I got mine

[-] zerofatorial@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We are afraid of immigration because there is so few housing that bringing people will just add to the pressure and make rents even more ridiculously expensive . Also, in my country (Portugal), these workers accept working for less and live in miserable conditions (overcrowded homes, tents outside of Lisbon, etc), making it worse for everyone else, causing an exodus of qualified people and a flood of “tourism workers” because salaries just not increase when there are people accepting to work for less.

Meanwhile our public services are collapsing left and right because qualified people just leave and there are so many new people trying to access public healthcare etc.

This is not the black and white immigration is good/bad you are making it out to be .

[-] Darkhoof@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm from Portugal also and it's not immigration that is driving high rent prices. That's a disingenuous position. Golden visas and Airbnb have contributed MUCH more to this as well as the liberalization of rents coupled with low new housing projects.

The workers that accept low salaries are mostly seasonal workers and they don't compete with locals for decent housing and if you were honest you would mention that most of the time you have plenty of them living in the same space. Again, not occupying a lot of the housing destined for locals. I don't see locals eager to go live in Odemira in the houses occupied by seasonal workers or in Martim Moniz in degraded housing.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same here and totally agree with you.

I've actually worked in Finance and spent 20 years abroad before coming back to Portugal and it was obvious already when I arrived 4 years ago, that government measures were rigging the housing market to be ever higher: Golden Visa in exchange for €500k "realestate investment", tax discounts for retirees from the rest of Europe to come live in Portugal, Digital Nomad visas, such a bullshit regulatory regime for AirBnB businesses that (eventually, after 10 years) the highest court finally ruled that unlike what the "regulation" said, you can't just convert appartments to AirBnB businesses as you feel like and have to follow the same rules as ALL OTHER BUSINESSES, and, last but not least, a complete total refusal to regulate speculative investment in Portuguese realestate by foreign investors (something as simple as a minimum 6-month residence in Portugal requirement similar to many other countries would've made a huge difference and still be compatible wth EU rules as it doesn't discriminate between portuguese and other EU citizens).

And this was just their Demand side manipulation.

On the Supply side, housing construction was down to 1/3 of what it was in the 80s and there is pretty much no public housing construction in the country of Europe with the lowest percentage of public housing.

Meanwhile we get loud "we've created 100 student accomodation rooms in this old government building we didn't use" announcements as if they're so amazing when the local unis take in 50 thousand students per year for what are typically 3 year courses so 100 new rooms once every 10 years or so is doesn't even touch the problem of student accomodation (itself a subset of the wider housing problem).

(Note that most top level politicians from the 2 parties that alternate in Government have declared income as "real-estate investor").

Portugal is were it is in housing because the Portuguese are mainly dumb and greedy votting for greedy, incompetent snake-oil salesmen.

That said, the "immigration problem" in Portugal has to do with how the country mainly takes in people with far less average levels of Education than the locals, and hence not capable of working in the kind of higher value added jobs as the locals (especially the young). This is why almost everybody working as Uber and food delivery drivers are from Brasil or the Indian Subcontinent - unlike most other countries in Europe, Portugal has very little in the way of selectivity in who can come (especially from Brasil, whose citizens are the largest immigrant community in Portugal) plus it can't really attract the more well educated as richer countries can, so you mainly get a whole different kind of brasilians in Portugal than you get in, for example, Britain were I also lived.

You can't really get your Economy to climb up the value added ladder (and hence pay higher salaries) if you're pushing the locals to have fewer children or, even worse, to leave the country as soon as they finish their degrees, by pumping up house prices to increase your personal rewards from the side-business that you have as "realestate investor" alongside your politician day-job, whilst "making up for it" by importing people with a way lower level of education than those children would end up having and those degree-holding young adults leaving because houses are too expensive already have.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Also from Portugal and did you really just say that the problem with immigration is that they get exploited and then everyone ELSE suffers?

I mean i think you see what’s wrong with that.

Also without immigrants Portugal would be completely fucked because all the young people are leaving the country for better jobs in Europe. Someone needs to pick up the slack otherwise it’s just old people and a couple of children.

Also Portugal has a ton of houses. We are above average in houses per capita iirc. We have a problem with salaries and an over dependence on tourism.

[-] Darkhoof@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He's just someone trying to provide a false narrative to justify his racism.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Portugal has massive house price inflation problems in the places were the jobs are: all it takes is to look at the house price to incomes ratio in Portugal now and compare it with the historical average (last I checked it was 5x its historical average).

Sure, there are actually empty villages in the deep inland countryside were the only work is "subsistence farming" or "forrestry", for the simple reason that even being a cashier at a supermarket pays better so nobody is going to move there to do that work.

Looking at housing as "all houses everywhere have the same utility value" to be able to come up with that "there is no housing problem in Portugal" bollocks is beyond ridiculous.

That said, blaming immigrants is pure, unadulterated far-right nutter fantasism: the idea that the people with the least power in the country (who can't even vote) are to blame for this is logic-defying, to say the least.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine claiming your issue isn't with immigrants then immediately listing all the reasons immigrants are to blame for the actions of the capitalists that exploit them, and you, and the government that allows it.. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

This is not the black and white immigration is good/bad you are making it out to be .

no, it's just you who is wilfully ignorant. And afraid. Because of your wilful ignorance.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine not addressing any of the points, and instead just accusing someone of being wilfully ignorant.

How ignorant

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not against immigration but it's no solution. You're in Europe. You're trying to replace a workforce that has free education, in a place with high quality education infrastructure, therefore most of them have bachelors and probably at least one or more masters degrees, with essentially illiterate (and i mean this with all due respect) people from a completely different culture who are not prepared to do anything remotely useful for at least 10 years, probably more.

I've literally had migrant refugees from Lebanon, Somalia, Eritrea, Morocco and such as flatmates in Brussels. Some of them are my close friends. They are not remotely prepared to take over 90% of European jobs. You either need social skills, labor skills, language skills or technical skills which they simply do not have. If i was in their shoes, it would take me decades to catch up to how Europeans work.

The migrants come here for what ? Uber eats ? How are they supposed to support themselves ? With government integration money we don't have available ? But say we figure it out and they live and then they will have kids one day. Those kids will behave exactly like the local population. They will go to University, they will be highly qualified, they will be socially adapted to the place, culture and language and, they will also not have kids, just like the locals. So which problem did these migrants solve then ?

So the issue here isn't that we lack people in Europe. It's that our economic doctrine is deficient. We need to change the doctrine, not the people. Immigration will not solve this problem, it will perpetuate it. Young people not having kids is an economic issue that will still happen whether you have a European young person there or a Iraqi young person there. You can't simply transplant a young couple from a country with very high birth rates in a totally different part of the world, subjected to an entirely different set of circumstances and expect them to be the same in Europe. That's not how this works.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

with essentially illiterate (and i mean this with all due respect) people from a completely different culture who are not prepared to do anything remotely useful for at least 10 years, probably more.

You're talking shit. Immigrants make up 20% of the NHS in the UK, and loads also work in the care sector, those are vital jobs and you have to be literate. Most immigrants I've met speak better English than the local toe rags.

Those kids will behave exactly like the local population. They will go to University, they will be highly qualified, they will be socially adapted to the place, culture and language and, they will also not have kids, just like the local. So which problem did these migrants solve then ?

The lack of young workers?

[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

You are deliberately talking over them. They’re clearly not claiming that all migrants are illiterate or uneducated or ill-prepared for work in Europe. They’re arguing that many are, and those migrants exacerbate our problems. They certainly don’t solve them.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Define many. What percentage are illiterate?

[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It depends on the nation. The UN collects data. Afghanistan is 62.7% illiterate, for example. Further, Almost all refugees to Denmark have zero Danish language reading and writing skills. They must learn all of these. Slightly more (but shockingly few) have any English reading and writing skills.

Surely it isn't surprising to you that refugees have limited European language skills?

[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

refugee /ˌrɛfjʊˈdʒiː/ noun

a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.

Emigrating is a choice. Fleeing because you helped translate is not.

[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That definition of a refugee is perfectly compatible with the definition of a an immigrant. As per the definition, all refugees are immigrants. Not all immigrants are refugees.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Aren't western countries have strict education requirements before they would even consider permanent residency applications? Or are you talking about refugees, which imo shouldn't be counted as a way to replenish aging workforce because the governments let them in for humanitarian reason?

[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The large volume of applications of economic refugees made it so since 2015 the the education requirements are essentially waived. There are no wars in Morocco, for instance, but i personally know of refugees that hid their nationality to enter as war refugees. This is very common.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

most of them have bachelors

Only 30% of people in Europe have bachelors degrees, about the same as the u.s. Thats higher than in developing countries, say India at 8%, but a majority of people in both countries don't have degrees.

It's a common misconception by those with tertiary education in the first world that everyone else has tertiary education because they only talk to people in their social class with tertiary education.

[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're showing me an average with the entire population of Turkey and the Balcans. Look better at your data, please. Now consider where the majority of migrants are going and are being expected. It is not a genuine source of comparison. It's closer to 40%. Besides, like i also mentioned, it's not just higher education.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The original post was about Europe, that's the European average. Even the E.U. average is 30% and that doesn't include turkey and some of the Balkans. Also the point still stands even for the best example of Luxembourg at 46%, it's still less than half. Most people in Europe do not have a bachelors.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago

So what I hear you're saying is that education is the solution.

We could educate immigrants, which will take some time. We could also educate the Europeans so they don't take the jobs that requires shorter educations. Either way we will need the immigrants to solve the current demand.

The problem is that the same thing was tried in the 1970s and it didn't turn out well when the demand for low skill workers decreased again. We already know that the demand will drop again in 20-30 years, so we should already now focus on educating the immigrants, so they can function in society after the low skill jobs are gone.

Another thing is that it's not like we can stop immigration. The climate changes will result in massive immigration whether we "allow" it or not. They're not going to sit and die outside imaginary lines on the ground.

IMO, the only realistic option is to accept and start educating immigrants.

[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not saying they can't be or shouldn't beintegrated. What I'm saying is that their existence will not affect the demographic crisis in any meaningful way. They won't have kids, just as the locals. I've seen it happen. If we're saving people, we're saving people, but let's not pretend it's because of the population crisis, because that is irrelevant to the problem

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you noticed what governments all over Europe have done to Adult Education in the last couple of decades???!

Indeed, the genuine, strategically well thought, policy on immigration for all involved would be to bring people over, educate them and integrate them.

The thing is, the immigration policies we have are mainly to bring over people to exploit them to the max without investing in them at all - they're about growing the local underclass to lower the employment costs of food delivery apps, restauration, garbage collection and similar, not about shared prosperity for both the locals and those that were invited in and should have been treated as guests rather than thrown (along with their children: see the baundeliers in France) into a life of poverty because they're starting far below the locals in the opportunities ladder due to their lower formal education level and difficulties with local language.

Meanwhile you have muppets on the make-believe-Leftwing-Rightwing political theatre both approaching the whole subject of immigration in a highly reductionist way as some kind of Identity War, all the while the people with most of the money rub their hands in glee whilst they cash in on the misery of locals and guests alike.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

Yes I know and it's about to repeat. And yes it's driven by the political puppets of the industry.

You can tell because it's the same liberal centre parties who used to flirt with the right wing to gain votes, who are now suddenly calling for guest workers, without any support from their own voters. They don't care what happens to these people in the future. They just want to flood the employment market with cheap labour because their friends wants that.

More immigration is inevitable, but it shouldn't be like this.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Those kids will behave exactly like the local population.

Guess you haven't been to the UK

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Putting the side the whole moral aspect of it, the only way to make importing less well educated people function in most European countries would be a huge investment in Adult Dducation, and we're in the late-neoliberal political period were governments (some more, some less) have been busy cutting taxes and hence public expenses, and typically Adult Education is one of the first to have been cut.

The very people who have set up open door immigration policies claiming that we need them because of the aging of the population refuse to invest in those who they made our guests to become fully productive and integrated citizens and instead are happy to for them to live in or near poverty working low-value and highly insecure jobs such as food delivery driver for some exploitative "Startup" that doesn't even pay taxes.

This shit isn't at all being done for the reasons we are told it's being done.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 9 points 1 year ago

Not when you consider that so many are rather old and afraid of change (something which correlates with age).

[-] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Many comments below (->above?) about housing. But it seems to me, the problem in much of Europe is that many old people hang on to large half-empty family houses, so over 65s are occupying a lot more space than under 15s (although the latter have more energy, need space to play ...). It's a pity they blame immigrants for this.

[-] danque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

For me it's more a cherry on a cake. We already have a housing problem for a couple years. Most young starters can't afford to purchase/rent a house, so that look for cheaper options. Those cheaper options are given away to immigrants because of emergency housing laws. This in turn causes less houses for the population that can't afford new houses. It's not just a problem of immigration (not even that much) it's a problem that existing empty houses go way over the affordable price and on top of that the immigrants get the houses for free.

So yeah focus all that and I can see why people blame immigration, but it's absolutely not the only cause. I would prefer it more if the government limits the prices of housing, but this causes investment in housing to drop as well. It's a dirty vicious greedy circle that points to immigrants as the easy target.

I should also add that some immigrants don't accept other temporary options and want a bigger house for free, whilst the population pays 150-200%. That also causes friction.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you look into the issues caused by (mass) immigration or related to that then it makes much more sense imo.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
479 points (99.4% liked)

World News

39402 readers
2185 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS