31
submitted 2 years ago by really@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I get what you're saying, but it's not just monetary efficiency that I meant there. It's fuel/emissions efficiency that would suffer as well. And that should be of concern to everyone.

[-] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

If that's the concern use a fucking train

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

You're right, the transatlantic train should be good enough for anyone. Who needs planes when a train gets you across the ocean with much less pollution!

No need to be aggressive mate. Your replies are rather antagonistic.

[-] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml -4 points 2 years ago

Aggressive would be shooting down jets until everybody stops flying on fossil fuels, which would be good to do by the way

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
31 points (70.1% liked)

World News

36931 readers
1064 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS