199
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

This war shows just how broken social media has become — The global town square is in ruins::The global town square is in ruins.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nodsocket@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Imagine believing that a service as important as a "global town square" should be a private company.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The news, as always, is conflating capitalism with freedom and truth. Capitalism promises neither, only money.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Do you think it should be run by the (US) government instead?

I'm pretty lefty and think the government should be large and powerful, but not like that.

Fediverse is the best compromise I've seen, still private but a little bit democratic because of instance hopping if you don't like the policies of the one you started on.

[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

I have whiplash watching the left argue that Twitter was a private company so they could censor anyone they liked, then immediately 180 when Musk bought it and decry private ownership and operation of de facto town squares. For the record, I don’t think town squares should be privately owned, but at least I’m consistent. Apparently on the internet ethical beliefs are a shiny coat to put on when it’s convenient.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My personal opinion is that "Global Town Square" is just nonsense that Musk made up. Twitter is not the first big privately owned social network and won't be the last.

The closest thing to that town square idea that actually exists is undermoderated cesspools like 4chan, which is not a good thing. Good moderation is simply necessary to have reasonable discussions/communities, and I feel like I believe that consistently.
I don't know if you think the (US) government should have that role, I think it would be a bit of a conflict of interest.

And I think what's happening to Twitter is unfortunate, but yeah the owner can do whatever he likes to it. However that still doesn't mean I have to approve of his choices or stay quiet about them either, that's not inconsistency to praise a company or its owner when they do good things and boo them when they do awful things. I'm certainly not going to say that he shouldn't have the right to censor whatever he wants, but it's still reasonable to complain about which things he chooses to exercise that right on.

The only reasonable alternative to these big private social networks I've seen is the fediverse, still private, but a slight bit more democratic in that if you disagree with your instance's moderation or administration, you can just use a different instance and usually still access most of the same communities.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
199 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59708 readers
1563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS