191
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 year ago

Call me crazy, but I don't want a PC run by a phone operating system.

[-] ProtonBadger@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not saying it will. My gaming laptop is already running the same Linux kernel as Android phones so the kernel is great. Then it's down to the GUI and that might be a good fit for hospitality/healthcare/retail as the article says where some devices are already run in more or less of a Kiosk style with specific purpose. Besides phones are just small PCs anyway, it's all about the use-case.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Why though? Immutable Operating Systems are great for regular usage. Android is restricted and closed up, compared to Linux or Windows. But its damn secure.

Having the app support, on this ecosystem where every app always is in its container, would be huge.

But I prefer Fedora Atomic, its more or less the same, but actually free, with wide app support and no Google.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because I do all kinds of things with my OS that they probably didn't consider when they were locking things down. I enjoy the freedom and flexibility of a desktop OS while I'm on a desktop. Even Mac OS drives me up the walls sometimes.

Edit: phone changed Max to Max.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Yes of course, me neither. Android sucks. Its locked down and all.

But what is the typical "laptop user"?

  • uses windows as it was preinstalled
  • uses Edge or Chrome as its preinstalled, Bundleware or they get Ads for it
  • has some weird Adobe stuff like Reader. Apps autostart in the background and phone home as they wish to "check licenses" and whatever
  • has Viruses and doesnt care

Viruses basically dont exist on Android

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Well yeah... We are not saying is for everyone. Like it's nice for less technical people were it's more difficult for them to fuck it up or get confused with technical stuff and they do not need anything advanced or sometime that flexible, just a couple of apps an a browser.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah it would probably be great for someone like my mother. She's an expert at breaking her operating system and anything to lock her system down would be helpful. I'm sure there are millions of people who never do much more than read emails, browse the web, and maybe do some spreadsheet work, and it would be great for them too. For me, I like control. I use Arch on my laptop and Pop on my gaming computer so that I'm not constrained by whatever Microsoft or Apple are currently trying to simplify with their OS.

Edit: I also stopped using Windows because it's becoming pretty similar to spyware and adware these days, and every time you turn all that stuff off, they turn it back on with the next update. I reached my wits end about 3-4 years ago and dumped Windows completely for everything except Fusion 360.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg -1 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a lot of FUD.

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You mean Tim Apple?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Phones are pcs so I don’t see the issue

The problem I see with this is that Linux doesn’t do well enough as it is so fragmenting it further isn’t going to move the needle against Windows (IMO)

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

You don't use a phone the same way that you use a PC, or at least I don't.

[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of people do though. That's the problem. Most people just browse Facebook and watch YouTube. Anyone doing other stuff is "a hacker"

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That’s not going to matter as far as the OS is concerned; that’s more device limits

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Believe it or not Android is solidly capable as an OS without too big of a hardware requirement. Give Android x86 a shot and you'll see how fast it can be. Pretty decently optimized. Sadly last Android the supported was 11.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
191 points (85.5% liked)

Android

28034 readers
80 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS