-123
submitted 1 year ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Do you agree? If not, what's your counter arguments?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] H2207@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago
  • Proton & Lutris
  • Libreoffice & Nextcloud
  • G.I.M.P, Inkscape, Krita
  • It's cooler, more secure, more private, more trusting etc.
  • More compatible than Windows 11 that's for sure
[-] atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago
  • this is 100% valid. even on wayland it's working great.
  • it took like 3 days to migrate my whole workflow to libreoffice. it's definitely doable for 95% of ms office users but when you're in a big company it gets tricky. formulas work a little bit different so you have to consider that. libreoffice is case sensitive, ms office is not.
  • this is again mostly a compatibility with other parties issue. and from what i understand photoshop has a lot of third party addons that would definitely be cumbursome to migrate.
  • i have to use windows at work and it drives me crazy. constant notifications for mundane stuff, no package manager, no sane way to keep apps up-to-date, commandline is shit.
  • even freebsd was better at handling my thinkpad. i have a wifi dongle, on linux it just works, on windows i have to install an xp app to be able to use that.
[-] kevin@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Really the only thing that I miss on Linux is creative cloud stuff. Yeah, gimp and inkscape cover 80% of the functionality of PS and Illustrator right out of the gate, and I bet I could get to 90% if I sank a bunch of hours into learning the differences. Which is amazing for open source software.

But there's a gap when you have a team of dedicated and highly paid developers and hordes of creatives testing everything out and demanding progress that's going to be hard to overcome.

[-] atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

sometimes that's right, but other times it fires back. like in autodesk software, it turns into a money making machine. because they're the industry standard for more than a decade now, they just pump out new version every year with barely any changes and deliberately not forward compatible. so you just pay more every month, because everything is subscription based now.

[-] kevin@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

That's fair. Another example of what you describe that I'm more familiar with is Epic (medical records software). My hypothesis is that the differences that matter are:

  1. Cost of switching is higher and/or
  2. The people making the decision (business manager, hospital admin) are farther from the actual users of the software.

Could be lots of other reasons too, but these are the ones that jump out at me.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
-123 points (8.7% liked)

Linux

47859 readers
1721 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS