67
submitted 1 year ago by igalmarino@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

All of these types of plastic you're using as counterexamples are more distinct from each other than they are from biological polymers.

Plastics are a ridiculously diverse group of chemicals, not including naturally occurring polymers is anthropocentric and not always useful.

[-] stoneparchment@possumpat.io 1 points 1 year ago

What, in your opinion, is the semantic difference between the words plastic and polymer?

What is your word of choice to distinguish between naturally occurring and lab-made polymers?

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

It depends on the context. Sometimes plastic is good for that, but in this case I don't believe that it is.

Plastic is not a rigorous term. When discussing specific plastics it's petty much always better to describe specifics, because plastics are too diverse of chemistry to do anything else.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
67 points (92.4% liked)

Science

13200 readers
7 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS