176
Cisco Finds New Zero Day Bug, Pledges Patches in Days
(www.darkreading.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
176 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
59414 readers
1156 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Or, hear me out, maybe we don’t expose network management interfaces to untrusted networks? Sure, shit can still get breached by very deep intrusions, but at least you don’t show up on shodan!?
This is the way. It baffles me how often I have to have 'the talk' with IT people. Don't be lazy, create a secure tunnel into the LAN!
I’ve discovered interfaces left behind on lan vlans - and they’re all set up with separate mgmt network, so why make one on LAN for some quick test and leave it behind. With web, cli and api open….
At least have a source IP access list only allowing trusted IP ranges. Ideally it would only be reached from an internal IP range or bastion host, but not all companies have a security hat to wear.
This is the barest of minimalistic security. It's a router. You don't allow external admin access to the router. Period. End of story.
I dont disagree with you if a company has a competent employee configuring them.
It shouldn't even be allowed by the router software.
Indeed, from a tenable article:
So yeah, maybe not widen your attack surface to the whole fucking internet in the first place.