1742
Respect to anyone still managing a library of mp3s
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
1742 points (97.8% liked)
memes
10342 readers
1489 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Then for you it doesn't matter. But it may matter to people you share your music with, and I think higher-quality should proliferate instead of lower-quality.
Also I listened to that A/B test - glitchy mess on my android phone for some reason, but still got 23/25 with my $10 Panasonic earbuds.
Most people can't tell. That's why 128kb streaming is doing so well. It's also why "hifi" streaming is just snake oil, and FLAC and any bitrate above 128 is a waste of space. Anybody's who's into music should take that test and figure out if they should be storing FLACs and paying for things like Tidal.
But it takes all sorts, like for example listening to FLAC with $10 Panasonic earbuds.
Hold on, you can totally hear the difference between 128 and 320 kbps encoded MP3s, even with some generic mobile phone earbuds.
I don't notice it on any of my sound listening options, never have but I definitely do hear it on a buddies high end setup