1360
Decriminalise all drugs (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)

alt texttweet by Johann Hari: The core of addiction is not wanting to be present in life, because pour life is too painful a place to be. This is why imposing more pain or punishment on a person with an addiction problem actually makes their addiction worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I’m not really sold on that. Drug addicts are victims and shouldn’t be penalized but drug dealers definitely deserve jail.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

In most of the world people who sell weed are "drug dealers"; are you including them as well?

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

If it’s illegal in that country, yes.

It should be legal everywhere, but if you’re selling it where it isn’t you’re still breaking the law. Iirc most countries that have it legal also have a lot of regulations on it so selling it in a random back alley without certification would still be a crime.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

So what, I'm a victim of an evil drug dealer if I buy weed in Texas but I'm just a satisfied customer if I buy weed in Washington?

You're engaging in the circular logic of thinking illegal things are bad because they're illegal and they need to stay illegal because they're bad. You need to understand the laws have no inherent moral value, and nothing is bad simply because it's illegal.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They don’t need to stay illegal, I explicitly said they shouldn’t.

But if you’re buying it in Texas you’re likely doing it from a backalley random anonymous guy who takes no accountability and might give you who-knows-what mixed with it. I’d say in those circumstances even selling apples should be illegal.

It’s like comparing prescription Xanax to smuggled benzos from India.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I never met a junkie that didn't also sell at least a bit to help pay for the habit. I get what you mean, some dealers/orgs are obviously bad people and often these aren't even addicts at all to their own product, but where do you draw the line.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s why I think it’s a difficult thing to handle.

My opinion would be something like this (though it’s probably very flawed as I just thought of it on the spot and I’m not extremely knowledgeable on the subject):

Are you positive to a drug test? Are you willing to cooperate on where did you get them?

Yes-Yes: Confiscation and advice to go to a rehab center

Yes-No: Confiscation and advice to go to a rehab center unless it’s a repeat offense, in that case I’d force the rehab center

No-Yes: Just confiscation

No-No: I’m assuming you’re the dealer, jail

[-] Kanda@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

I just found these drugs on you, which you are obviously using. How'd you like to pee in a cup while a creepy, uniformed man watches your dingdong intensely?

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

If you don’t want to be watched by a creepy uniformed man you can come to the police station and do it in the toilet.

Or just, not do stuff that’s illegal. If people nowadays still do it knowing they risk jail, risking a brief uneasy situation seems way less threatening.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How about fuck all that, and just leave people alone?

If they aren't harming anyone, leave them the fuck alone unless they ask for help.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They are harming people by selling hard drugs to them.

[-] RVMWSN@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

that's your view, there's very different types of drugs, and not all hard drugs are harmful. Putting people doing harmless 'crimes' in jail, that is what is harmful to society.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What would you consider a “hard drug” that isn’t harmful? Isn’t its very definition a way to distinguish them from soft drugs which are less harmful?

[-] RVMWSN@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Afaik only cannabis and alcohol are considered soft drugs. Cannabis actually has quite a few people addicted to it. Alcohol does an incredible amount of harm to health and society. Take a look at shrooms, which are usually considered hard-drugs: no-one is addicted to it, it's not bad for your health, it's actually a very healing experience and is being considered more and more as a proper treatment for psychological problems. Shrooms are usually consumed very responsibly, there are of course always some idiots who don't know what they are doing. Still they're considered hard drugs and conservative minded people often don't want to hear about legalization, without any rational argument.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Shrooms are a valid argument, I’ve seen them categorized as both. I was more talking about stuff that is pretty much universally deemed a “hard drug”, like cocaine, heroin, ecstasy or meth.

[-] RVMWSN@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think cocaine, heroine and meth are not to be messed with, I my view they're bad for you. I think ecstasy is on another level. Where I live it's the most commonly used hard drugs and I think most people use it in a healthy manner. That is to say a few times per year max, they go to a festival, they dance their asses off and they share a hug. The problem with ecstasy is that it can be a gateway drugs. It gives such an incredible feeling of happiness that people will want to relive it the next weekend, but that will never work. If you can manage to not give in to that and just wait a few months, then all is well. But if you give in and go again next week, you won't reach the same heights. People will suggest you take other stuff to help overcome this, designer drugs, speed, cocaine, etc. and then things go downhill. I think ecstasy in itself, with moderation, is not an unhealthy thing to do. I think it has clear psychological benefits to use it occasionally.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Eh, I’d say that’s still way too dangerous for public consumption.

I read it could have benefits too, but that’s not enough of a reason for full legalization imo. Supervised usage in restricted environments for therapeutic purposes could be possible, but any more than that will make the risks outweigh the benefits by too much.

[-] RVMWSN@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, I don't quite understand that sentiment. It's really not that dangerous. Alcohol is a thousand times more dangerous.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, you said yourself it’s something that should be used a few times a year max. Leaving something like that as easily obtainable whenever you want seems a recipe for disaster.

Alcohol can be dangerous, but only if you drink a fuckton or if you do on a daily basis (and even then, it has to be a certain level of alcohol because one glass of wine per day isn’t really that harmful). It should definitely be regulated better, but saying it’s more dangerous than ecstasy seems a bit too much.

Anyway there isn’t really much of a point in discussing any further whether stuff like ecstasy should be fully legalized or not when plain old cannabis is still illegal in most of the world. Let’s first do the stuff we (almost?) everyone agree with.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
1360 points (95.6% liked)

People Twitter

5624 readers
1613 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS