TLDR: It's really really underbaked, should've delayed it like 6 months. I have refunded the game and returned back to C:S 1 with DLC unlocker.

You could also just put it on a list to keep an eye on and look at it in six months or a year later.

I think that a number of times, publishers put out a half-baked release but do ultimately see the issues at release fixed. Fallout 76 was horrendous at release, and while it's still not Fallout 5, I think that the updates have made it a decent game. Cyberpunk 2077 also wasn't ready at release, and while I haven't looked at it recently, my understanding is that with updates and DLC, it's also pretty decent. Paradox does have a history of titles that see a lot of post-release work.

I think that in many cases, the patientgamers crowd -- wait at minimum a year after release before looking at a game -- has the right idea. They may not get the absolute latest, blingiest stuff. But:

• Many bugs are often fixed by then. You aren't the guinea pig.

• The hardware it runs on is cheaper and/or performance is better.

• People will have done up wikis to refer to.

• The game itself may cost less.

• DLC is out. For many games -- Paradox games in particular -- a lot of the content is in the DLC, and the base game is kind of dwarfed by the DLC. For a number of these, a new title in a series isn't going to be as good as the last before a lot of DLC has come out.

• Mods are out. For some games, particularly on the PC, mods make the game vastly better.

I'm not saying that everyone should do that. But in this case, we knew going into the release -- and the developer announced -- that the performance wasn't where they wanted it to be at release. So I think that this is a good candidate to wait on. Either they improve performance post-release or they won't. Either way, you'll know prior to purchase. Plus, hardware keeps getting faster, so to a certain degree, performance problems solve themselves.