85
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world to c/risa@startrek.website

I know this is how people in the 80s and 90 imagined the future and a lot of concepts were probably too far fetched for them.

BUT... why arent they using drones to explore planets? why are there not more drone-spaceships? why does enterprise need a crew to begin with? Why is there so little automation? Why so few uses of AI in general?

I am saying this as a star trek the next generation person. I'd also expect them to have full video and sensory streams of any surface mission teams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sxan@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

So, this one is a little more justifiable.

Phasers, and starships. And because ST isn't about war; it's about diplomacy.

With the exception of the Borg, there are no personal shields. One person with a phaser is a WMD; it's a sweep-able, incredibly destructive weapon, and if you're not interested in merely maximum casualties, it also has an effecting area-effect stun mode.

But the other reason is starships. Ignoring plot devices, orbital targetting is incredibly accurate and starship phaser banks can anihilate entire areas. If you tried to move an army across an area, it could be vaporized by a single enemy starship.

Either the enemy has superior technology, in case it doesn't matter if you send 1 or 1,000 people; or they have inferior technology in which case you need only one person. And if you have air (space) superiority, you can level cities with even a smaller starship.

So ST is more like special forces making surgical strikes, sending in problem solvers and diplomats, and hoping nobody starts shooting in earnest.

Because phasers are OP.

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

a phaser is a WMD

I had no idea about this tbh they come of as very tame weapon, especially the whole stun setting part.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

It can be used that way, sure, and the Very Civilized Starfleet uses them conservatively. But a beam weapon that is capable of disintegrating anything (unshielded) that it touches is crazy powerful. And those are only the hand phasers; we don't often see the phaser rifles, but holy heck. If phasers scale like projectile weapons do, a single phaser rifle would be capable of vaporizing entire buildings, tanks, aircraft.

[-] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't a simple mirror be enough to reflect the rays back to the sender?

[-] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Phasers aren't lasers, and the beam isn't light; so, probably not.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
85 points (87.0% liked)

Risa

6941 readers
2 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS