206
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

They'll claim it, but it's actually still easy to determine if an image is AI generated with minimal effort.

Legitimate images will have a source and knowing the source will allow you to validate things like meta data and location/time the image was taken.

AI is really only useful for entirely synthetic images.

[-] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Average people don't care. Otherwise, Fox News would not exist.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

That's a bit of a misanthropic viewpoint. Sure people will believe what they want, but AI images aren't going to convince anyone who wasn't already convinced, and they definitely will never serve as anything more than very temporary smokescreens that instantly betray the legitimacy of whoever uses them.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
206 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13551 readers
821 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS