124
submitted 1 year ago by ijeff@lemdro.id to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 1 year ago

It's possible this is a result of improvements Intel is planning for their x86 chips. They've already mirrored the efficiency and performance core designs that AFAIK originated in ARM.

In a way, this might be Intel making a prediction based on how years ago Intel launched an x86 replacement, and AMD launched x86-64 ... and AMD won because people didn't want to rebuild all their software/couldn't get their software.

[-] sanzky@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

yeah but back then it was not 90% web apps. also programming languages are way better supporting both platforms. ARM is far from being a little player anymore

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 1 year ago

That's true, but Windows ARM and Linux desktop ARM are still pretty niche.

The web apps thing definitely makes this a lot easier for ARM to takeoff in the PC segment. Though, a lot of those devices are pretty well served by Chromebooks ... of which, I think many are already ARM.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37758 readers
603 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS