117
Was volcel a mistake?
(hexbear.net)
the study's age range was 10-24.
Article isnt even about video games
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
117 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13541 readers
785 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
TV and movies would be sooooo much better if all sex and nudity were gone and then I could enjoy media without having to check if it has that before watching to avoid
they have the mpaa ratings. they tell you if it has sex in it
I find those are often not clear.
when the theocratic hays code of prudish Americans isn't strict enough for you
LOL good bit
Not being an “anything goes” libertarian has to be a bit?
lmaooo
Oh, sorry I don’t agree with the weird libertarian position that we shouldn’t regulate social ills. We have a duty to society to ensure ill ideas aren’t propagated and opposing it seems like only something a libertarian would agree with
the existence of sex isn't a social ill
Oh sure, it totally hasn’t resulted in unneeded harm to countless individuals
Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.
Pablo Picasso
Irregardless of Picasso’s dream world, most people are in contact with art and can be influenced by it.
all of society should conform to your specific whims
Liking sex = perversion
Sex existing = perversion
These are your standards so I definitely don’t think you should be in charge of media regulations
inappropriate for who? in what setting? at what time? that word has no meaning without a context for it to describe.
Jesus fucking christ, you are off the deep end into theocratic prudishness. The vast majority of people on Earth don't think there should be 0 sex in any art. You are by far the minority
And here it is, the accusations of religiousness as soon as someone disagree with you.
well tbf most people dont arrive an monstrously out of touch and delusional takes like blanket considering one of the most natural basic things about the human experience, like food or anything else, "disgusting behavior" without some kind of bizarre overzealous cult poisoning from early on
you have a irrational fanatical anti-human puritanism, what else should i call it? It's fine to not want sex for yourself, it's not to attempt to control all of society to impose your views.
To call my statement anti human is absurd. I see an issue with society that I think we would be well served to fix. You may see that I haven’t made any religious argument yet you still chose to accuse me of that. Nothing I have said reflect religion in the least
you said you wanted to have all films not have any sexual content whatsoever, and anyone who disagrees with you is a "pervert or libertarian". This is not a coherent view of a socialized adult. You should not have any influence on regulation or creation of art. You wanting to "fix" the 90+% of people who like to fuck and like having fucking in some of their art is exactly the anti-human aspect of your outlook, it's a fundamental aspect of humanity you want to "fix" with your moralistic idealistic grubby little mitts
The post you comment shows that it’s not true that everyone wants that wretched stuff in the content they consume.
And now, I am not allowed to be involved in the creation of art either? Yet I am the one trying to control others?
Even if what you said about me was true that wouldn’t make me anti human. I’m not anti AES just because I disagree with China in certain policies