165
submitted 1 year ago by alt@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Nothing however beats the Breda M30 LMG.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Damn. The Wikipedia page reads like an article on how not to design a machine gun.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh it was an absolute dumpsterfire. A M1 Garand probably had a higher sustained rate of fire.

[-] Bademantel@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

According to the article it is very much comparable:

"When considering all of the gun's deficiencies, taken during combat when it was at its worst, the practical rate of fire of the Breda 30 could even have been comparable to a semi-automatic weapon's practical rate of fire, as the standard American rifle was (the M1 Garand and M1 Carbine) and the later German Gewehr 43."

Really a fun read.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

yeah, and if you check out the forgotten weapons video on the gun you can actually see that on top of all that they were probably really expensive to make!

[-] Bademantel@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Amazing, I had hoped there would be a video from him but didn't look for some reason. Thanks for the link!

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
165 points (93.7% liked)

> Greentext

7522 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS