101
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
101 points (99.0% liked)
Creepy Wikipedia
3875 readers
80 users here now
A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust
Guidelines:
-
Follow the Code of Conduct
-
Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy
-
Strictly Wikipedia submissions only
-
Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis
-
Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.
-
Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).
Mandatory:
If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Hmm, interesting. But the guy in the video doesn't speak a lot about the criticism of this theorem:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33_Polyhymnia
So there is another meteor, which was estimated the same way at the same time as 33 Polyhymnia, and they measured again later and they found it was 20 times less dense...
While it sounds like an interesting theorem this doesn't shine a good light on it. It's also strange that he "forgot" to mention this in the video.
He does say that the measurements need to be confirmed, but it's way at the end of the video.
Yes, I watched the video, but he didn't mentioned that there was already a similar meteor where they already remeasured. It lowered a bit my expectations after I looked this up.