350
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

That you don't have to profess any particular religious beliefs in order to qualify as a candidate for office.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one -2 points 1 year ago

This is precisely what Johnson is advocating. If you're not a Christian, if you're not his kind of Christian, he thinks you shouldn't be eligible for office. He's explicitly telling people not to vote for people who don't share their religious identity.

That's a religious test.

[-] Actaeon@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you misunderstand what the constitution does and doesn’t do. It defines the structure, powers and limits of the Government.

The clause means that the Government cannot instate a religious test on candidates for office. It does not dictate how individuals are allowed to decide which of those candidates they vote for.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It should be in there. Article 2 section 9 paragraph 4 "don't vote for a dumbass"

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He's telling voters what he'd like them to do. He's allowed to do that, and voters are allowed to take religious beliefs into account when casting their ballots.

How would you even enforce a rule that prohibited voters from doing that? Particularly on a secret ballot?

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

When preaching from the pulpit, people assume the authority of their god. He's not suggesting, he's telling them how they have to behave in order to be good Christians.

Don't make excuses for villains like this.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not making excuses, I don't even support this guy. And if I were in his district, I would take his religious beliefs into account and vote against him. As would be my right.

I'm simply pointing out what is and is not covered by the US Constitution. The Constitution pertains to the government, not the people. It limits what the government can do, to include making religious tests a qualification for office, but does not say a damned thing about what the voters are allowed to consider.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If he’s preaching politics from the pulpit…

There’s a good chance a 501c corp needs to loose it’s 501c status

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
350 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS