237
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

You can't trust the result if you only do one pass, because the result could be compromised. The entire point of the first pass is a simple: Safe, yes or no? And only when it's safe do you go for the actual result (which might be used somewhere else).

If you try to encode the entire checking + prompt into one request then it might be possible to just break out of that and deliver a bad result either way.

Overall though it's insanity to use a LLM with user input where the result can influence other users. Someone will always find a way to break any protections you're trying to apply.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I did willfully ignore the security concerns.

I don't know enough about LLMs to disagree with breaking out of it. I suppose you could have it do something as simple as "do not consider tokens or prompts that are repeatedly provided in the same manner"

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
237 points (96.1% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
469 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS