404
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

went on tv and announced that we would completely back Israel no matter what they did?

That never happened. In fact, a few days after the attack by Hamas, Biden warned Israel to follow the rules of war.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

(postscript : I don't think Biden wanted to see the tit-for-tat atrocities from Israel, I think he has recoiled and is trying to put a lid on it now. But the speech was a major and foreseeable fuckup on the practical and moral levels)

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2023/10/10/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-terrorist-attacks-in-israel-2/

So here's the bit talking about restraint:

We also discussed how democracies like Israel and the United States are stronger and more secure when we act according to the rule of law.

Terrorists purpo- — purposefully target civilians, kill them. We uphold the laws of war — the law of war. It matters. There’s a difference.

The rest is a lot like this

So, in this moment, we must be crystal clear: We stand with Israel. We stand with Israel. And we will make sure Israel has what it needs to take care of its citizens, defend itself, and respond to this attack.

And let there be no doubt: The United States has Israel’s back.

We’re — we’re with Israel. Let’s make no mistake.

Interpretations can differ, but on balance I can easily understand why Bibi (correctly) interpreted that as a blank check. Yeah maybe we'd tut-tut and furrow our brow, but the guns and bombs are gonna flow regardless.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First of all, Biden hasn't sent any weapons to Israel since October 7. And he's not planning to send "guns and bombs", he is asking Congress for anti-missile systems accompanied by humanitarian aid for Gaza. Which I think is appropriate.

Second, I don't think Bibi interpreted that as a blank check. I think Bibi is an idiot who doesn't care what Biden thinks. In a follow-up speech on 10/19, Biden had much more to say:

President Netanyahu and I discussed again, yesterday, the critical need for Israel to operate by the laws of war. That means protecting civilians in combat as best as they can. The people of Gaza urgently need food, water and medicine. ...

As I said in Israel, as hard as it is, we cannot give up on peace. We cannot give up on a two-state solution. Israel and Palestinians equally deserve to live in safety, dignity and peace. ...

When I was in Israel yesterday, I said that when America experienced the hell of 9/11, we felt enraged as well, and while we sought and got justice, we made mistakes. So I caution the government of Israel not to be blinded by rage.

However, Israel is a sovereign country and unfortunately isn't taking orders from the US. The US is trying its usual approach of attempting to bribe a foreign government into better behavior, but success is hardly guaranteed.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 1 year ago

How dare you come in here with your facts! /s

(Thanks)

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

First of all, Biden hasn’t sent any weapons to Israel since October 7.

They've definitely sent ammunition.

[-] UnknownQuantity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

What are the rules of war against a prison camp? We could perhaps consult the Federal Bureau of Prisons manual, but I did not find the word "war" in it. Unfortunately, I don't read Hebrew, so I came up blank there too.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Not sure what you're referring to, but rules of war do not prohibit prison camps.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

No, they're (correctly) saying that Gaza itself is a prison camp.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe it is, but that's that doesn't violate rules of war.

The sad fact is that the rules of war permit a lot of awful things, because war is intrinsically awful.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No no they're being sarcastic. They're asking what the rules of war say about going to war with a prison camp.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Fair enough! Thanks for explaining!

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

And did he make good on that warning?

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well, there has certainly been a change in tone from the US, with new calls for a pause in fighting. And this is likely to affect the shape of the current aid package.

But Israel is ultimately a sovereign country. Biden doesn't support Israel unconditionally as some have accused, but he also can't force Israel to do what he wants.

Your head is so far up your ass. It’s obvious you are not commenting in good faith.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

And this is likely to affect the shape of the current aid package.

So what exactly will it include if not weapons?

Biden doesn’t support Israel unconditionally as some have accused, but he also can’t force Israel to do what he wants.

He actually can. Reagan did it in the 80s.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
404 points (97.2% liked)

News

23424 readers
1767 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS