588
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bearwithastick@feddit.ch 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a group.. you mean a very limited setting where you can discuss directly with everyone and get direct feedback in real time from everyone?

How do you suggest that this might work on a large scale, with millions of people?

Edit: And if for example 10 million people somehow found consensus and then one guy is like "lmao no", everything gets canned?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

There's lots of ideas about this, but my solution is to simply eliminate the idea that we need to rule millions of people.

[-] bearwithastick@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

So some form of tribalism? And what if you generally like living in your consensus community but one thing rubs you wrong and you're against it? You just leave and look for a community where you agree with everything 100% all the time? Good luck with that.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What would you do if your roommate wouldn't help with the housework? Or had some quirk you didn't like? Would you just leave or would you try to work it out?

One thing this thread has taught me is a lot more people than I think can't conceive of alternatives to the shitty system we have. Churchill said it's the best so we're not gonna change it, right?

[-] bearwithastick@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, you are not elaborating on your better alternatives. We KNOW that democracy is nort perfect. We are just looking for a solution that is doable in todays world. So now you come in and claim to somehow have a better way to do it. But when questioned, your answers are very vague, we have to pull all the info out of your nose. This tells me you probably don't have any better solutions or just some vague idea of one and no real world application for it.

Of course I would try to work it out. But you just assume this always happens, but what if it DOESN'T?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sorry I didn't have a full treatise on the implementation of anarchism in a modern society prepared for you. I forgot the Internet is Very Serious Business™ and I get paid for educating people on it, not my actual job.

[-] bearwithastick@feddit.ch 3 points 1 year ago

If you want Anarchism, just say so instead of using vague answers?

And the thing with "Educate yourself" is so fucking lazy and a dumbass argument if you claim to have the answer?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Internet: Serious Business.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
588 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39026 readers
1184 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS