381
Actors’ Union Says It Receives ‘Last, Best and Final’ Offer From Studios
(www.nytimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
381 points (98.5% liked)
News
23616 readers
3824 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Please help us help the studio executives find a better offer by buying some swag here.
sagaftra.org/official-sag-aftra-strike-swag-available
swagaftra
Oh look, it’s fake Margot Robbie again
You leave our Margot alone!
Pretty sure that's the real Margot Robbie, check their post history! It's really cool that Margs is part of the community!!
oh yeah, check the post history, some how Margot Robbie is an expert in programming IDEs: https://lemm.ee/comment/5424323
Pretty sure this is some Linux nerd running an elaborate joke. Nothing in Margot Robbie’s bio, or interviews suggest a background or interest in programming.
Knowing the difference between VS and VSCode hardly makes me an expert on IDEs. Even if the subject came up (and it never does), why would I ever brag about having basic knowledge of random subjects on national TV?
Also, if I remember correctly, wasn't there this recent summer blockbuster where the female protagonist defying stereotype and saying something unexpectedly knowledgeable or insightful was a recurring (and somewhat overused) joke?
But some inexplicable reason, I just can't recall the name of that movie, only in theater July 21st.
Have you ever mentioned Lemmy in any official communication?
Because I would love to see any tangible proof it's the real MR.
I'll wait post strike, no hurry here.
Jokes aren't as funny if you explain them.
When the right time comes, you'll know.
Bro, learn to take a joke.
Well you can see she has a lot of newfound spare time with the strikes, it's possible she just picked it up. It's also possible that she keeps that part of her life private.
Throughout the profile there's tons of proof it's her, she makes references to the strikes and her movies constantly! There's even a picture of herself as the profile pic!!
Just because Margot is an actress doesn't mean she doesn't program, be a little bit open minded. I think it's pretty neat that she's an expert in programming IDE's now, maybe Lemmy is what sparkled her interest to learn!
Edit: Your name is phoneymouse! I looked up the definition of phoney. According to Marian Webster it means "not genuine or real.". I think you're projecting!
You caught me, I’m not a real mouse. At least I’m upfront about it.
She'd hardly be the first woman in hollywood who's movies were only a facet of their awesomeness.
Hello Margot Robbie!
Hi!
No. Hollywood actors don't need more money.
That's true for some of them, but not all actors are A-listers
I mean, even D-list actors don't need more money.
a) the Ulmer scale (A–D) hasn't been used in nearly 15 years, and even then it was out of date
b) panel show and reality TV appearances (The 'D' section of the Ulmer) aren't really the major concern here
Tell me the amount of money you think I got paid for a night shoot for a single ep appearance (not co-star) on BET?
Then tell me how much you think I've earned in residuals from it since?
Say more about this? I've seen a few good pieces about acting compensation over the years, but nowhere near as many as I'd have liked.
How much did you get paid, assuming it's not hypothetical? What do panel and reality shows pay? I assume residuals are $0, but I know nothing. What's the real story here?
"Guest Star", unnamed character, end roll credits only, 1 ep, about 5 or 6 lines. Just over a grand before fees, about USD$800 after, not factoring year end taxes. No residuals as I wasn't a principal and it wasn't full SAG.
You got paid $800 for one-night's work and 5 or 6 lines?
And still complaining? Lol. Get a grip.
1 nights work on set (i think i got there at 6pm and ended up being wrapped about 8am), but you only work once every couple of months AND you're not counting auditions, wardrobe/fitting call, driving, So it was actually $800 for about 30 hours work (again before tax). Are you telling me that working for $25/hour gross for an overnight shift once, a few times a year is a big privilege?
Both me and my wife are actors. I do more stage, she does more commercials. We both have day jobs - mine is corporate and I either kill myself working 100 hour weeks or use my PTO when I get cast, hers is education and so just has to turn down gigs if they clash with her work.
Not to mention
I also sit on the board of three theatre companies (unpaid) and judge a few festivals (paid in free tickets to the shows I'm judging and sometimes a dinner).
If you're making less than $25/hour and working less than a few times a year, so that you can call me privileged I'd be incredibly surprised.
I don't get it. You got paid $25/hour for your work and you're still complaining, why? Because it's a gig?
Why should your gigs pay more when you can do something else useful for society while you're not getting gigs?
I'm sorry if you think your list matters at all. All it does is show me the disconnect people like you have with those who work significantly harder than you for significantly less. I think they should get paid more before you do.
Because it's not very good pay in return for a) what you have to give for it and b) more importantly — what studios get for it.
I disagree with your point A.
On point B, studios should get less. It's not that actors should make more.
This means cheaper products for audiences and more money they can spend on other things (not extra profits for studios.)
Heck, some of that money could even go towards those who work harder than you for less!
why should these workers not negotiate for better earnings because other workers in other fields work harder for less? it comes across as just silly rationalizations for the crux of the issue which is that you simply don't respect the work actors put in
Wrong. I don't respect passing a bunch of money around at the top.
If there are people who work significantly harder than you for less money, you don't need more. The guy I was replying to mentioned how much studios make vs. actors. I replied by saying the solution is for studios to make less, not for actors to make more.
Of course, if you're indoctrinated to believe everyone 'needs' more money except billionaires, then nothing I say is going to make sense. You need to learn what the word 'need' means first.
How much did you get paid for 1 night of being in front of a camera?
Also, I don't really care about the specific ulmer scale. It's a good tool to discuss the popularity of actors, you can replace D-list with E, F, G, etc etc. until the point makes sense to you.
I mean you were the one who used it, so if you don't care about how popular an actor is, why do you think they should get paid less?
Lets even the field: What work do you do, and why should you get a pay cut starting tomorrow?