771
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I really don’t understand the way the US works in regards to „bought“ sex… on the one hand prostitution is illegal (with the exception of ~~Las Vegas~~ parts of Nevada) and as soon as you point a camera on the paid fucking it is called PORN and it is still a multi billion dollar industry.

You guys are weird

Edit: changed the Las Vegas part

[-] teft@startrek.website 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Prostitution isn't legal in Vegas. Parts of Nevada yes, but in Clark county where Las Vegas is located prostitution is illegal.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That's more insane than what the original comment pointed out.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It's very bizarre. Kinda shocking the gov't hasn't figured out the massive amount of tax revenue behind the legalization of sex workers.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Works in other countries at least. Here in Germany they just pay income tax, like everyone else. Actually they are freelancers usually…

On the other hand, Germany is still a bit backwards regarding cannabis legalization… but we are working on it.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Illegal income is taxed, technically, but paying that tax would also basically be a confession. That's how they got mobsters back in the day. So there ends up not being any when you're right and there absolutely could be good tax revenue there

Hell, it's not federally banned, so it's just states not being willing.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

There are porn producers who do such a crappy job that I’d swear they only film so they have legal access to prostitution.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Like 90% of OF "fan meets" are filmed fucks because it's actually prostitution. Pretty sad they can't be honest because some people had weir hangups hundreds of years ago

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Go on any hookup app or site and you'll see plenty of "content creators" willing to meet up and "make content."

[-] MisterD@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

It started a few centuries ago when this annoying group of people known as Puritans were expelled from their home country and sailed to north America.

The natives saved them from starvation and today still impose their beliefs and values on everybody. These hypocritical laws is but one example

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They were not expelled from anywhere. They wanted to impose their religious doctrine on everyone else but every government keep telling them to fuck off.

[-] Palerider@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

I don't believe they were expelled?

I might be wrong...

[-] stella@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's easy to get confused because a lot of people who left England did so because they had no other prospects or no other choice, in the case of criminals or financial delinquents.

Reading up on the founding of the US is a doozy. Essentially, all the rejects of England sailed to the 'New World' because there was more opportunity for them there than at home.

The ones who had it good stayed in England.

[-] guleblanc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The Puritans were a small sect, just looking for the religious freedom to punish the best majority of people who didn't believe the Puritans' theology. Their notion of "religious freedom" is similar to the U.S. Catholic bishops' notion. It's a violation of religious freedom when people can make their own choices, and don't have to obey a hierarchy.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Basically all the founders and settlers were groups who were too weird for Europe lol

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

What's weird is that loophole exists and people don't abuse it.

Like, I get the streetwalkers selling $10 BJs dont, but for "high end" organizations like this, just stick an old school camcorder in the room and let the John keep whatever grainy unidentifiable footage they make during the encounter.

If you're ever investigated, you're in the clear. If not, then no one even has to know.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nah. A group tried this in Pensacola and got busted. Can't remember the details, but they were trying to pass prostitution off as pr0n because camera. Didn't fly.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I bet employment fraud would have a bigger jail sentence than prostitution.

[-] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

people don't abuse it.

Maybe not as simple as "film it and you're good", but an entire 'studio' (GDP) was relatively recently shut down because they told the women it wouldn't be seen by anyone (a lie), and many of the women felt assaulted afterwards. Besides just for money, I am positive that the 'producers' for this were using the porn loophole to rape these women. On top of that, there are plenty of other 'studios' that are all about hiring escorts and filming the encounter.

It's very much a loophole that is abused. Whether or not the people who are responsible are caught, that's another story.

The only thing that can help with this is legalizing and regulating sex work so that people involved don't have to (and in many cases, cannot) do it completely in the shadows anymore.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It's called the "First Amendment," and you'll find it can be used to justify/unjustify all sorts of things depending on the current government in power.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Not las Vegas, rural parts of Nevada

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
771 points (99.0% liked)

News

23644 readers
2080 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS