431
submitted 10 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 10 months ago

kinda inevitable. with as fast as dna can be sequenced now.. we are publicly broadcasting this information. how can we realistically protect something we broadcast. its kinda like having your photo taken in public. at some point, its gunna happen.

do you have an expectation of privacy on data you publicly broadcast 24/7 everywhere all the time? i dont think so. i think its silly to try.

its only a matter a time before most of the world is captured into a continually aggregated genetic database of unique individuals which will inevitably all link back together.

are there going to be bad actors? yep. lets prosecute those mofos, but this kind of aggregations is far from evil or wrong or.. stoppable.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Holy shit, GATTACA was supposed to be a cautionary tale, not an instruction manual!

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

i call this the 'tipper gore affect'. aka, 'you see what you want to see'

im kinda hopin we dont go down the full-on genetic editing path as they did in the movie.. maybe just hardcore embryo defect filtering for know diseases/errors

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

It's not even the genetic editing that was the biggest issue, IMO. It was the pervasive surveillance and discrimination that was even worse.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 10 months ago

yep, good point. it would be nice to solve for those issues before theyre applicable to dna. humans still suck in a lot of ways

[-] thehatfox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

how can we realistically protect something we broadcast.

With appropriate privacy laws and security measures. A smartphone is publicly broadcasting information, in that any other person could receive the radio transmissions emitted from them. But such eavesdropping would be illegal in most cases, and is mostly encrypted to hinder bad actors who don’t obey such laws.

It’s important we act now to ensure there are suitable privacy provisions in place now for all biometrics, before such things as mass DNA collection and sequencing are practical. Once such technology is available, perhaps we will also have to adapt our behaviour in public to prevent leakage of unprotected biometric assets.

Time to start advocating for biometric privacy, and investing in bodysuits and hair nets.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -1 points 10 months ago

you are completely ignoring the fact that a global genetic database is not only in progress, it is inevitable.

you cannot protect something you not only broadcast to the entire world with every breathe, but are also incapable of stopping or encrypting that data, or breaking its chain back to the other humans to which you got yours from.

we absolutely should protect humans from corporations looking to abuse this data, but you need to understand. its public data, and there is zero you can do about its existence or aggregation.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
431 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS