528
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Quexotic@infosec.pub to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MenKlash@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

The dilemma is how you define harming others and what implies being intolerant to an idea rather than a person holding that idea.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Harm is a pretty solid metric. Not some imaginary "think of the children" harm, but the "this disturbs/literally harms me" kind.

Yes, some people are precious little weirdos that won't want to see anything. The question then falls to society to determine if it was ultimately tolerable if they bring up grievance. Then the paradox comes in because the general vibes are always a moving target.

[-] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Sorry but no, it's not in any way solid. Some think of what they see as sinful as harmful.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No, sin is wholly different than harm.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
528 points (99.8% liked)

196

16377 readers
2877 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS