116

The question above for the most part, been reading up on it. Also want to it for learning purposes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Definitely dual stack if you do. The real benefit of IPv6 is that, supposedly, each of your internal devices can have its own address and be directly accessible, but I don't think anyone actually wants all of their internal network exposed to the internet. My ISP provides IPv6, but only a single /128 address, so everything still goes through NAT.

Setting it up was definitely a learning process - SLAAC vs DHCP; isc's dhcpd uses all different keywords for 6 vs 4, you have to run 6 and 4 in separate processes. It's definitely doable, but I think the main benefit is the knowledge you gain.

[-] Katrina@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 year ago

And the biggest disadvantage of IPv6 is that each of your internal devices has its own address and can be directly accessible from outside. So you need to completely rethink how you do security.

[-] lemming007@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

And can be identified/tracked individually by outside entities. In IPv4, a website sees both my device and my kid's device as the same IP. In IPv6 they're different so this just provides more ways for them to track you.

[-] mea_rah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

First of all they use much more than the device IP to identify individual devices. IPv4 is no longer all that useful for identification with things like CGNAT being common.

But with IPv6 they'll see my device IP, then they'll see the same device with completely different IP, then again. Same for my kid's device. But again, all of the above applies. It is a concern, but there are much better ways of tracking you anyways.

[-] Onion6068@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That's the reason for rcf 4941. It randomises the host part of your IPv6 address.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4941

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
116 points (95.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40183 readers
446 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS