185
SAG-AFTRA reveals terms of ‘groundbreaking’ deal
(www.cnn.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
185 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
59648 readers
1520 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Having an audio book that shifts voices and tone easy but can also include background noises"
That's not what you're going to get. Even with A.I they all requires sound editing and reviewing and fixing errors which all costs money. We already have the tech to do A.I voice acting and I've tried a few. What we'll get is what we have now, a single A.I voice with eerie intonation that modifies some words to their context but not others so it functions for a sentence but cannot emote a paragraph.
Are you saying that AI isn't improving?
I just read someone that said they listened to an audio book that did do this.
No I'm saying that when we get a new game changing technology things don't tend to become better produced, they become cheaper to produce cheaply and quality be damned
The thing is a lot of audiobooks aren't being produced at all right now, or aren't being produced to an acceptable quality standard (not because the narrator is bad, but because they and they editor weren't paid enough to get it right.
In this case, I think cheaper production would result in better audiobooks.
I think game changing tech is always better but we as consumers are complicit in allowing the erosion of the benefit because were complacent.
Look at podcasts as an example. It beat the shit out of any other media at the time. Just hobbiest and funny people making content. Content that didn't have any producers making sure people stayed on script. No ads, ever to interrupt or make creators panic about topics. Then rogan started pushing pocket pussies and everybody said its cool because its only 2 mins and skippable. Years later its now multiple unskippable ads on a paid service where we pay to avoid ads.
The only time we could have stopped the current problem is when it wasn't a problem. But we don't have that foresight
So game changing tech is great, if we keep it on track. Don't let it erode.
You must be listening to different podcasts to me. Those "hobbiest" content creators are still there, and they tend to have decent microphones now and have learned how to create fairly high production value content. Yes, they have ads, but they're short and skippable (or even at the end of the episode) and you want them to get paid for their work right? Otherwise they won't do it.
Sure, shitty podcasts are also available. Just don't subscribe to them.
I don't want them to get paid. I want people like me who are so passionate about a thing that they make stuff for the community.
What I don't want are for those people to not bother creating things because the whole technology shifted towards profit motivations and the space and tech was taking over by the 1000th comedian who is leveraging a free advertising method to sell tickets and still ends up selling ad space like they're a fender in NASCAR.
And no ads are not all skippable. No they're not short, they interrupt, they infiltrate every corner of our lives and podcasts were popular early on because they were the exact opposite of what they are now. Now its just radio 2.0.