181
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
181 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10179 readers
149 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You know, unless you're someone in Gaza whose life Biden's military aid package to Israel will end, but hey, they're just brown people!
Voting blue instead of abstaining or voting 3rd party? Sure, but let's not downplay how bad the Blue Team is. By voting for them, we are being complicit in the crimes of the Democrats in order to stave off worse crimes, but are still complicit in the murder and genocide nonetheless.
Do you honestly think the Republicans wouldn't support Israel?
And a vote for 3rd parties is a vote for Republicans.
And Israel would be attacking Palestine even without US support, given Hamas is still going to be attacking them.
What in my comment gave you that impression? Do you think that just because both parties would do it absolves you from being complicit in it?
So is a vote for Democrats, since they're doing nothing to actually stop Republicans. The 2 party system is built so that control switches between the 2 parties. One party will never hold it indefinitely.
So your argument is that we may as well just go along with the genocide since it will happen with or without us?
This is peak Centrism. "I don't agree with the genocide, but I'll go along with it since I've got nothing better to do."
Not everyone agrees it's a genocide.
If Israel wanted they have the weapons and ability to raze Gaza to the ground and kill everyone in it in a matter of weeks. But they haven't done that.
"If you do the genocide slow, it's not really a genocide! Not everyone agrees that killing thousands of children of one particular ethnicity is a genocide, anyways. They should be thankful they're not all dead already, because if Israel wanted them to be, they could do it. Really, only killing this many makes Israel the good guys here!"
So you just want Israel to let Hamas attack and kill them then? Because Hamas attacks from populated areas, any counter attacks will result in civilian casualties.
Holy false dichotomies, Batman!
"In order to prevent the genocide, Israel must commit the genocide!" BIG BRAIN!
It's a pretty piss poor attempt at a genocide by Israel. They have the armaments and ability to have wiped out everyone in Gaza by now. If they wanted thew Palestinians genocided, they could have done it already.
I think you are confused about the definition of genocide.
It doesn't mean to exterminate all people in an area.
It means to kill large numbers of people based on their ethnicity or nationality, which Israel is doing. They not targeting Hamas, they're targeting Palestinians, and they're doing it in such a way to make Gaza uninhabitable. All the infra is being targeted. All the hospitals are being targeted. Over 40% of the housing units are destroyed already. It's a genocide.
Still a piss poor attempt.