96
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Is there something I’m out of the loop on re:ML’s eyebrows?

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

Mona Lisa has no clearly visible eyebrows or eyelashes, although Vasari describes the eyebrows in detail. In 2007, French engineer Pascal Cotte announced that his ultra-high resolution scans of the painting provide evidence that Mona Lisa was originally painted with eyelashes and eyebrows, but that these had gradually disappeared over time, perhaps as a result of overcleaning. Cotte discovered that the painting had been reworked several times, with changes made to the size of the face and the direction of gaze. He also found that in one layer the subject was depicted wearing numerous hairpins and a headdress adorned with pearls which was later scrubbed out and overpainted

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And we’re making fun of Pascal in this context?

[-] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

There's a lot of context missing here, the full "conversation" is this: https://imgur.io/gallery/3xT9L5x

There are several copies/versions of the ML thought (this is also a matter of debate) to be painted by Leonardo himself, and the Prado version – unlike the "original" – has been restored with state of the art techniques, and it shows eyebrows.

One thing many people don't realize is that all those famous paintings looked drastically different at their time, they have faded, yellowed, darkened, and very often have been altered, overpainted, or even cut.

https://brightside.me/articles/16-famous-paintings-that-were-restored-by-talented-professionals-797948/

https://theguardian.com/technology/commentisfree/2021/jul/03/enjoy-the-restored-night-watch-but-dont-ignore-the-machine-behind-the-rembrandt

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I think it's in reply to a comment made off-screen?

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
96 points (94.4% liked)

Murdered by Words

3 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS