3

Two posts, two different instances, two different sets of comments. Ok, there are pros and cons:

Segmenting the conversation means that different opinions and perspectives have a bigger opportunity to rise to the top in each discussion. That’s good.

There is also a risk of too few different viewpoints being present in one instance or another, making the possibility of an echo chamber forming higher. That’s bad.

I’m not suggesting that there’s a single perfect way to handle it, nothing is that black and white, but maybe there is a chance to do better. Perhaps crossposted content could contain a second link underneath between the body of the post and the comments section that could inform users that an identical post existed on another instance. Perhaps the comment sections could be merged but the user could choose to filter by instance if they wanted to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, the creator might not know of all the communities where the post might be relevant. You'd end up either with everyone bugging the poster to xpost it everywhere; or everyone just copying the post, making things worse.

Seeing an xpost might lead you to finding nee communities you didn't know, it's one of the best discovery tools.

[-] trouser_mouse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That makes sense, hadn't even occurred to me!

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17688 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS