279
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

"I never meant to hurt him, only kidnap and potentially murder his wife!"

In his defense, the article does a much better job of explaining the apology than the headline

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 1 year ago

Adversarial process at work. Each side works against each other as hard as they can within the bounds of law and the jury (or just judge, depending) decides.

It's ridiculous, but the defense attorney working as hard as possible against the prosecution. If there's even a tiny hope of it working it's worth trying.

[-] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

They're still wrong because criminal law has the concept of transferred intent.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just had to google that, but it’s astounding that needs to be spelled out into law. Before that was inked out could you just call a mulligan if you killed the wrong person?

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 year ago

This is why we need a scientific system and not an adversarial one. We need the truth regardless of who is harmed by it.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
279 points (96.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12319 readers
469 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS