Survey says:?

So you say 200,000-300,000 deaths in 20 years is better that 11,000 in one month?

I didn't say either was morally correct but one is clearly statistically worse as a matter of casualties. Why you think that's attempting justifying either is beyond me and perhaps something you aught to reflect on personally.

Correct.

I never said anything about it's morality but causing a years worth of deaths in Afghanistan/Iraq in a single month with the vast majority being non combatants and over a third being non military aged children.

Perhaps you did, I didn't see it but you certainly haven't reflected on it if you think your argument is sound.

That would be more deaths bud.

Oh "it's just faster" gotcha. Industrialized murder is somehow more ethically sound to you, gotcha.