226
submitted 1 year ago by soyagi@yiffit.net to c/world@lemmy.world

So maybe the huge worry people had after the news that WHO would classify it as cancerous was a little too much. I think the media could have reported on it in a bit more responsible way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not a shock.

Food scares are almost always over blown (except obviously tide pods).

People thought MSG was going to kill everyone. People thought Cholesterol was the key to good health. Even fat in moderation is perfectly fine.

But Fish will kill you with mercury, uncooked pork will kill you with everything (which is unlikely to happen in the first place, but also most pork you get is already cooked, at least sausage and hams). Salmonella is definitely going to kill you. Your kitchen is going to burn down, Fried food will end your life, and all processed food is bad.

Remember Supersize me? Remember the guy who ate two big macs a day for multiple years. That SINGLE guy should have been the end of the entire documentary, because he basically showed "Yes you can eat McDonalds in moderation and have a healthy life." But instead "McDonalds is going to kill you with super sized food."

The fact is you're probably more likely to get Ebola than most of these things actually contributing to your death.. though speaking of disease myths...

These things rush in, kill a business or a company, and then are forgotten, and then 10 years later new science comes out and goes "Btw it wasn't as bad as people thought... try it out"

[-] Woland@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

About the MSG hysteria, it's not even rooted in actual medical data, just run-of-the-mill xenophobia, which in itself is absolutely wild to me. It's like a whole chunk of the population collectively decided to develop the palate of a toddler, turning up their nose to "foreign" food.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monosodium_glutamate "Researchers, doctors, and activists have tied the controversy about MSG to xenophobia and racism against Chinese culture,[62][63][64][65][66] saying that East Asian cuisine is being targeted while the widespread use of MSG in other processed food hasn't been stigmatized.[67] These activists have claimed that the perpetuation of the negative image of MSG through the Chinese restaurant syndrome was caused by "xenophobic" or "racist" biases.[68][69]"

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I didn't dive deep on MSG just to not sound like I'm ranting about that specifically but you nailed it. It was more about Chinese restaurants (at least that's how I heard it) and I remember my parents saying we don't go to Chinese restaurants during the hysteria.

Sucks because I love Chinese food, and Thai, Korean, Japanese and more.

[-] gundog48@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not exclusively though. For many the fact that there a scary sounding chemical called MSG in their food is enough. Lots of people are obsessive about 'additives' and assume they are all bad.

[-] else@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps, but I've seen prejudice against MSG in many Asian American families including those of Chinese descent. Anecdotally, it's more than xenophobia at play for its reputation.

[-] DreamySweet@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Even the tide pod thing was over blown. No one was actually eating them, it was just a meme.

I mean, unless this article is a fabrication, I think that's enough deaths for concern.

Not suggesting in any way that it was the fault of the mfr, but to me that's plenty to justify folks wanting something done to curb it.

And I curse those folks every single time I have to smash through the lid of my Persil laundry discs with brute strength because the lids are actually people-proof. 🙂

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

My web browser is calling that article unsafe.

Probably because it contains MSG

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Some people literally were tho.

[-] DreamySweet@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

A few, yeah. Most people using the meme were joking about it. The media saw a few memes, wrote some clickbait articles, and boomers who don't understand memes freaked out.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I agree, but the "Tide pods are bad don't eat them" is true... (Though almost all media hysteria is over blown, it's a constant.)

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

As a side note, i don't think the skinny guy from Super Size Me who eats 2 Big macs a day is a picture of exemplary health. Dude is either a genetic outlier or he will drop dead of a coronary one day.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All of those could be explanations. Here's another one.

Big macs are 583 calories... two big macs are about 1100 calories... aka perfectly reasonable in a healthy diet. I forget if he ate two a day or two in some meals, but a nutritionist would ok that Calorie count.

Morgan Spurlock pushed "no one can eat here and be healthy" but he constantly pushed for combo meals ate in one sitting, and supersized every time they asked. That's like someone going into a bar and saying yes every time the bartender goes "Want another one" and then going "OMG I'm so wasted and got alcohol poisoning" he set the rules up to make sure he failed, because no one is saying eat a combo meal at Mcdonalds for three meals a day.

The thing is it WOULD be interesting if he looked into why he can maintain a reasonable weight while eating it.... but of course they didn't because that would prove Mcdonalds isn't the worst thing ever. Morgan had two goals. Prove Mcdonalds is unhealthy (And ignore contrary evidence) and make an entertaining documentary. He did the later, but I feel like he never even came close to the former because his methodology was shit.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

He's not all that special or unhealthy. 2 big macs is about 1k calories, if you get them as two meals with coke it's about 2k calories. If that's your food for the day it's perfectly fine for a moderately active person. The sodium is probably the most dangerous part and just drinking more water would likely keep that in check as well.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People seem to not understand that not everything is about calories. There’s a fuck ton of grease and fat in that food. You might not exactly gain a ton of weight but you’ll be coating your arteries with all of that fat. A little fat is good. We all need fat. But the amount of fat that is in fried and red meat is very high. Too high to be eating everyday even if you’re within calorie limits

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

McDonald's isn't actually super fatty or greasey. Fats are overly demonized, they don't make you fat.

[-] Saneless@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Being the same word confuses people and you can tell they have no idea how things work. They think the fat from food literally just passes right into your body parts and fat stores without being processed

Growing up in the 80s when everything went fat free was a nightmare and made everyone, ironically, get fat

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, they are the same word because they are the same thing: lipids.

However, the relation of fats to eachother inside a body as storage and outside as calorie intake ARE two different things.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s ground beef. Of course it’s super fatty.

High fat is bad for you. Eating any thing high in fat will coat your arteries in fat if you’re eating it all of the time as every meal every day. Never once did I say it would make you fat. It will clog your arteries leading to congestive heart failure if it gets bad enough.

I’m not saying eat LOW fat. I’m not saying to cut out fat. But eating a very high fat content diet is terrible for you. Ask any doctor. You’d have to have absolutely zero health sense to think eating burgers every day with fries isn’t terrible for your health.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Clogging arteries is also about cholesterol, which is increasingly determined to be mostly genetic and dietary is secondary.

You can find nutrition studies to support or attack anything, it's one of the worst sectors of science. The US is still recovering from the awful food pyramid paid for by grain farmers. Many cultural cuisines are loaded with fats, olive oil is in everything around the Mediterranean, France uses creams and butters, inuits live on almost exclusively protein and fat.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As long as you get around 25-50 grams in a day you should be fine, it will keep your hormones in check.

[-] havokdj@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sodium isn't even dangerous unless you are taking in an absolutely abhorrant excess of it. Everyone should be getting 5 grams a day, and a couple grams more will not cause any harm except for the extreme saltiness when you next sweat.

[-] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Everything in moderation as long as it isn't straight up poisonous.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And even then, small amounts will make you immune. No seriously, I saw it in a documentary called the Princess Bride.

[-] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

It depends on what substance it is. I wouldn't try and test this theory on plutonium, but some allergenic stuff can have vaccines made for them.

[-] gundog48@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I've started shooting myself with BBs, I'm working my way up to pellets, then. .22, probably going to stop before 50BMG, but before long, I will be unstoppable!

[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The constant stupidity around food makes science look really really bad and I bet it's the biggest contributor to people not trusting doctors and climate scientists. Personally I've become something like an antivaxer but with food. If people have been eating it for hundreds of years I trust it regardless of what studies say, and if it's newfangled processed food I don't trust it, also ignoring any study. I can easily see why some people wouldn't differentiate between these alarmist food studies and the much more legitimate areas of science. It's wrong but I understand exactly where they're coming from.

[-] gundog48@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Plus the reporting on it.

At a certain point, people start saying things like "X is supposed to be bad now, but give it 5 years and it'll probably be healthy again!" or "they say you're not supposed to do Y anymore...".

Because, of course, most people get their information from news sources who are always trying to find the next superfood or poison that we've all been consuming for hundreds of years. And often, many of the things were taught when we're younger are no longer considered correct, or at least fully correct, anymore.

So at a point people just get tired, ignore all of it, and just do whatever they were going to do anyway, because from their perspective, scientists can't make their mind up anyway.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think it’s incumbent upon adults to see media blitzes as probably exaggerated and studded with misinfo.

If you don’t buy the initial wave, the accuracy of news goes way up.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The problem is most people aren't doing that, and even those who do get second hand/rumors/stories from other people and eventually succumb to misinformation.

I've heard many times that X is cancer causings. I wish it was one wave that you could ignore but this shit gets repeated entirely too often, and even if it's not, the misinformations operates outside of the individual, because downstream products (diet coke) moved away from this because of bad PR.

[-] sandmesomesand@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Supersize Me: "Wow, if I eat garbage at a 3000+ calorie rate a day, I'm gonna feel like shit! Please give me awards and adoration and play me in every high school health class!"

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don't forget TV shows, more documentaries and more.

Morgan Spurlock did VERY well for himself based on that completely bias "Study". Sadly that became the style of documentary for a while (and potentially still is). Fuck the facts, let's make entertainment!

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Everyone knew McDicks is bad for you. It was an entertaining doc. That's why people loved it. Also, most Americans are 100% ignorant to nutrition. Count your blessings it's a no brainer for you.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
226 points (94.5% liked)

World News

39112 readers
886 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS