143
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

X claimed Media Matters “manipulated” the social media platform by using accounts that exclusively followed accounts for major brands or users known to produce fringe content and “resorted to endlessly scrolling and refreshing” the feed until it found ads next to extremist posts.

Media Matters’ report misrepresented the typical experience on X “with the intention of harming X and its business”, the company said in the lawsuit.

[-] Tosti@feddit.nl 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Yes exactly. They proved that advertisements can and will be shown alongside objectionable content, and that there are no protections against that. Them conducting a test is not "manufacturing images". X arguing the vast majority of users won't experience that is merely because the majority of users won't browse that content - but those who do will see any adverts alongside it.

This is a frivolous lawsuit from a company that will probably be gone before the suit is even heard. Twitter is worth barely more than its debt at this point - and that's ignoring things like not paying rent for their offices.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
143 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37793 readers
383 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS