125
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Egon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

1984 but it's actually 82

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saeculum@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago

It's a settler state fighting a coloniser state on the basis that the settler state is the one who really deserves to own a rock far out in the ocean on the basis of a dubious historical claim against the wishes of the people who live there.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

I don't think it matters a whole lot given that the island was uninhabited when they got there. All that matters here is truly the people that exist today.

[-] huf@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

it probably costs the UK money to maintain its presence on the islands, so in the name of austerity, they should forcibly repatriate the inhabitants to england and leave the islands empty once again.

[-] Posadist_Paladin@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

the lathe demands someone 9/11 the falklands when britain is broke as an afghan trap and then xi will build real neom oxagon

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
933 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS