75
submitted 1 year ago by chloyster@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Laser@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

And honestly the example you gave is rather a good example of a remake. The PS2 is 20 years old at this point. If the game was well made and the remake/ remaster is well-executed? Why would anyone object to this?

New and exciting games exist. This isn't an issue. In most cases I'd even say that while money surely is important, in most cases it's not a lack of money preventing a good game, but rather another issue that might lead to funds running out. If that makes sense.

The current situation is way better than say 25-30 years ago, and those games weren't exactly trash.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Would be a good one, yes. But currently the trend is getting closer from 1.5 to 1 generation ago

Worst offenders to me are cod, despite a bigger time gap. Force bundling a remake into another live service game that STILL GETS SHUT DOWN AFTER A FEW YEARS FOR THE NEXT LIVE SERVICE.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30500 readers
128 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS