68
Seamount twice the size of world's tallest building discovered 'hidden under the waves'
(www.livescience.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
68 points (86.2% liked)
science
20711 readers
16 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just say nearly 1 mile high. Why are reporters so averse to standard measurements?
5,280 feet is 1,584 Canada geese stacked on top of each other for our neighbors up north unfamiliar with imperial units.
Good bot
Where is the problem? It says "1600 meter", which is perfectly fine and easy to scale. Initially, I was worried because they started with this "foot" thing while still having the word "science" in their name.
Doesn't sound as dramatic or clickbaity.
It was Washington's dream!
That was great. Too funny but 100% on point.
"You asked about the temperature–"
"I did not!"
5000 sounds higher than 1
Like you are averse to using the SI-System?
I'd love to know why. Giving me measurements in units of football fields, elephants, Olympic swimming pools, Empire State Buildings, or Mount Everest are fucking meaningless.
Just say 1.6 kilometers then. I’m not averse to metric, the measurement was just really close to a mile so I used that.
Agreed