68
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teft@startrek.website 32 points 11 months ago

twice the size of world's tallest building

5,250 feet above

Just say nearly 1 mile high. Why are reporters so averse to standard measurements?

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

5,280 feet is 1,584 Canada geese stacked on top of each other for our neighbors up north unfamiliar with imperial units.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Where is the problem? It says "1600 meter", which is perfectly fine and easy to scale. Initially, I was worried because they started with this "foot" thing while still having the word "science" in their name.

[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Doesn't sound as dramatic or clickbaity.

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] teft@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

That was great. Too funny but 100% on point.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago

"You asked about the temperature–"

"I did not!"

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

5000 sounds higher than 1

[-] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

Like you are averse to using the SI-System?

[-] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I'd love to know why. Giving me measurements in units of football fields, elephants, Olympic swimming pools, Empire State Buildings, or Mount Everest are fucking meaningless.

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
68 points (86.2% liked)

science

14595 readers
178 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS