339
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

...

Life at Sea Cruises' first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blazera@kbin.social 115 points 2 years ago

Cruises oughta be banned for how polluting they are. Rich folks can have em back when theyve cleaned up their climate mess.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago

No they may not. We acknowledge they’re filthy, rife with noro and other viruses, and aside from other pollution, dump raw sewage into open water.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Acquaintance went on a cruise. I made "covid cruise" jokes before he left. Well he came back and guess what.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Said I told you so without saying I told you so.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I went on a cruise before COVID. The cruise line stressed washing hands to the point that it became annoying. (They have a "washy washy happy happy" song that they sing.) They had good reason to even before COVID as norovirus spreads like wildfire on cruise ships.

Overall, my cruise was a fun experience, but I don't think I'd do it again - even setting COVID concerns aside. I'd rather go to some destination and walk around seeing the sights than be trapped on a giant boat with all those people.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

when theyve cleaned up their climate mess.

Ah, a doe eyed optimist, I see.

This oligarch party ain't stopping until everything that can burn does. At this point hope is irrational, a side effect of rational despair.

No one tells the wealth class anything. They tell us, and we obey like good lil capital generating livestock.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

The old gods must die. Clash of the titans time.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Apart from the areas others have mentioned they are also absolutely terrible for the local environment due to the number of tourists they drop on an area. We should ban them for that alone

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Rich folks

Cruises are often cheaper than just going on vacation.

My honeymoon cruise was less expensive than if we'd just flown to the Caribbean and stayed at an all-inclusive hotel.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Nations won’t stop using oil as long as it is economically viable.

Banning cruise ships doesn't matter if we still burn up the oil anyways.

[-] JustMy2c@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago

You are correct. Not using oil in one place, will only make it MORE AFFORDABLE for China and other mega pollution providers.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Except 1) we sent our rubbish there and dumped it in the water, air and dirt, and it doesn’t stay put, 2) it doesn’t stay put, 3) we sent manufacturing there to avoid paying people minimum, let alone livable wage. How shallow thinking is amazes me.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

we sent manufacturing there to avoid paying people minimum, let alone livable wage

This is a good thing for the people of both nations tho

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It very objectively is. Their people stop subsistence farming and our people get cheaper goods.

It's not like we're hurting for jobs.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

Now they get suicide nets and we get three jobs and a side hustle. That’s so disingenuous and just because fash lite party said it doesn’t make it okay to parrot it.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oh I'm sorry do you want a factory job? I can get you one no problem. I work in corporate for a large manufacturer.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Just saying we have way more jobs than people in mfg, which is why I said "it's not like we're hurting for jobs"

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Probably because those jobs mostly suck and treat humans as machinery. *edited out tmi.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't follow - you don't want things to be manufactured?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

I want the people to own the means of production.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's not ever going to happen.

Certainly not any time soon.

[-] JustMy2c@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago

What the h does that have to do with anything?

Fact of the current global economy is: you buy less oil (etc), other will snatch it up very quickly.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago
[-] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Sorry, but facts remain facts. Lots of good things you can do for nature but spending less oil just for the heck of it will probably mean some other country WITHOUT FILTERS IN THEIR CHIMNEYS will use it, at Lower price.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

And that’s an old paradigm that must die. I rebuke your negativity. We have the power but some would deceive us into thinking we’re bound. I rebuke that too.

[-] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Sure, but it's a real life situation that you won't admit too. Other ways are needed between "saving" and banning

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I didn’t say it isn’t. It’s sad that not only are we post-implicit and post-explicit communication. Thank you, Southern Strategy!

And that’s an old paradigm that must die.

Paradigm means “pattern” or “model.” I can’t think of any one syllable words to make it easier than that.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
339 points (95.9% liked)

News

36057 readers
986 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS