24

Sentry has moved to a new license for its products called Functional Source License, and explains in this article the story of the licensing for these products and why they throw BSL for FSL.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I wonder if this kind of license would be accepted by the rest of open-source communities. So far, SSPL is treated like a villain.

[-] explore_broaden@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

One difference (so far as I know, I’m not an expert on either situation) is that MongoDB requires copyright assignment for contributions seemingly because the license is so restrictive they can’t offer their own service under its terms (without open-sourcing all the software they use to host it). So far as I know Sentry does not require this (although the restriction against running a competing service does not affect them since they are the service, so I’m not sure this argument really holds up that well). Also the fact that that one encumbrance is released after two years helps their case a lot in my eyes.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
24 points (75.0% liked)

Open Source

31358 readers
81 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS