1216
submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 8 points 1 year ago

here in Santiago we have more than 1000 Electric Buses In operation, they work great.

Trolleys can't divert trough an alternative route if the original route got blocked somehow (for example it got barricaded.) wich is a common occurrence here in Santiago.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm Czech and my city has a trolleybus network. Every single trolleybus has either a) diesel engine or b) battery backup, depends on their age. Hell, there are even entire lines where 1/3rd they run on batteries. But, they can be smaller, so the vehicle is lighter.

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 2 points 1 year ago

that still doesn't adress the cost of implementing it on the more than 300 bus routes there are in Santiago or how probable is that the infrastructure would get damaged or destroyed every time there are protests.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Fortunately riots aren't an issue in my city

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago
[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

9 trolleybus lines, 3 of which I know have about 1/3rd without trolley wires at the end so buses go on battery/diesel

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 0 points 1 year ago

Santiago has 300 hundred lines of bus. all of them potentially serviceable by EBs.

Even if we electrified the main corridors, we would still need a lot of buses able to run the entire length of the rout independently.

and Santiago being Santiago that kind of infrastructure would be damaged on riots or something.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Okay? Doesn't mean Trolleybuses aren't the best compromise. Infrastructure costs money, so lets make the same argument about roads shall we?

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

we have private hways so the state doesn't have to pay as much.

We aren't a rich country.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Then privatize your local public transport. That is how it works in many of my country's cities. Networks are usually only half owned by the city government

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is half privatized already, but is heavily subsidized.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

its not that costly tonimplement. Why do you think they were implemented back then, instead of running everything on diesel engines?

The upfrontninvestment might be higher, but the running costs are lower, since the electricity is far mor energy efficient and electric engines need way less maintenance than IC-engines.

[-] another_lemming@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This number, 300, doesn't say anything. How many miles is that, excluding duplications? The inner city is easy and cheap to cover in power lines for trolleys to replace busses here, and everything other may be best kept on diesel.

What protests, lol? Repairing power lines is easy and fast and I doubt someone would target them.

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My city only really has trolleybus lines in the city center where it is cheaper and means no localized pollution

[-] another_lemming@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mine – too. It's just rational to do that for most popular and short routes.

[-] tim1996@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

non contiguous catenary is the best solution imo

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The what? I'm not Bri*ish enough to understand that

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1216 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
1436 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS