1110

If purchasing isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t stealing (fosstodon.org)

submitted 1 year ago by maegul@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

149 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am ashamed that I hadn’t reasoned this through given all the rubbish digital services have pulled with “purchases” being lies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] aksdb@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Remember that there were also big campaigns against tape recorders and VCR. They even managed to get VCR vendors to implement a feature that prevents users from skipping ads. So it's not like it's simply legal, the media corps were just not as successful in their lobbying as they are today.

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't find anything about VCR's blocking; I did find a bunch saying the opposite.

There were copy protections that prevented a VHS -> VHS copy being made of some movies. Easily defeated, but they did exist.

My scenario was recording an Over The Air transmission onto VHS using a VCR; not making a backup copy of a movie you purchased on VHS.

Edit: I do recall a campaign against VHS recording of TV shows, but didn't it ended basically saying "Broadcast public == public domain"?. That actually led to copy protections in VHS tapes.