80
submitted 1 year ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/piracy@lemmy.ml

rather than this stupid fucking snip snap game where, instead of, as a user being able to buy into a company that's building a massive, marvelous, library-of-alexandria-core archive of every good show ever made, you're paying into some shitty ephemeral bullshit made by stupid greedy dickheads who have no fucking sense

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bogdugg@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

My hot take is that you don't actually want fewer streamers. As it stands, pirates benefit the most from content wars because the services are paying more to produce shows than they are receiving in subscriptions.

The obvious losses are legacy content and access to it. I don't know that there's a good solution. A streaming service benefits most from surfacing content that will keep you on the platform, meaning either a modern series with promised future seasons, or older content that's still popular. Any old obscure media is going to lose money for rights holders on a $/stream deal because they could potentially make more $ from a single physical media sale than any amount of streaming would net them (if it's $/stream, and only 2 people stream it, that's very little return). And nobody subscribing to these services is going to shell out more money for specific titles because to them, that's why they're subscribing in the first place.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
80 points (92.6% liked)

Piracy

11 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/piracy

No netflix or streaming services landlubbers allowed, this is pirates territory.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS