118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
118 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13528 readers
929 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I heard some left commentary on this issue that I think best sums up what we have seen with censorship from these companies: The government pressures private companies that own these platforms to establish private censorship guidelines to get around constitutional protections against censorship.
I think that currently the government is struggling to adapt their censorship regime to the new communications structure/technology brought on by the growth and evolution of the internet. They haven't got the new censorship regime completely down yet.
Also, isn't it the most neolib thing imaginable for the government to manage its censorship regime through what is essentially a web of public-private partnerships with companies like Google.
I don't even think they need to apply pressure at the corporate level most of the time. The decision makers for stuff like this have only two sources of work that maintain their standard of living: other media companies, and government work. It's very easy to pressure people with extremely specialized line of work,.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/tiktok-chinese-trojan-horse-run-by-state-department-officials/284353/