33
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by NarrativeBear@lemmy.world to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Google hits a paywall. On the heels of a deal struck last week between Ottawa and Google, the search behemoth will pay Canadian news publishers $100 million/year for the privilege of hosting their content. Is that a win for Ottawa? Well, on one hand, Canada is now one of the first countries to compel digital platforms to pay (and help keep alive) news publishers. On the other, $100 million is the exact number Google offered pre-standoff and 42% less than what the government wanted. Either way, at least the public can once again access news through Google.

Ottawa has agreed to set a $100-million yearly cap on payments that Google will be required to make to media companies when the government's controversial online news legislation takes effect at the end of the year.

The legislation is called The Online News Act passed earlier this year and would force platforms like Google, Meta, Facebook and Instagram’s parent company, to strike deals with Canadian media publishers for sharing, linking, previewing, and directing users to online Canadian news content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

How about you stop giving telecom companies free money to build infrastructure which they don't build..

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago
[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nope the money is going from Google into the pockets of Canadian Telco companies.

It's actually a good point as companies like Bell and Rogers have large stakes in media as well as things like cell and phone service.

So I wonder even with Google making these "payments", will any of this money actually make it to reporters and journalist.

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but this $100MM from Google is directly linked to C-18, which links the payments to full-time journalists employed.

So, while I don't love that it'll help a company like Bell's bottom line because it offsets journalist salaries at CTV, and I definitely dislike that the PostMedia and TorStar billionaire owners will undoubtedly just pass through all their journalist subsidies to personal profit, I do like that it will help pay for journalists at the CBC and other editorially or financially independent news sources.

So, not all sunshine in this whole C18 / Google story, but what does all that actually have to do with telcos not building infrastructure?

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

So we're just subsidizing wages for billion dollar corporations?

All this hullabaloo and it turns out we're just subsidizing billionaires again.

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, consider that prior to this, Google was paying $0 to support the journalists who were driving web traffic to Google News / Search (besides paying them in exposure, of course), thereby not generating ad revenue for the actual news outlets directly. Meanwhile, Canadian tax dollars were subsidizing journalists' salaries.

Now, Google is supporting newsrooms by being forced through C-18 to pay for the news they're disseminating (and profiting from) to the tune of $100MM next year. That's $100MM in the Canadian Federal Budget that's freed up for other use (or savings).

So, not all bad. It's imperfect legislation, but it appears that the desired outcome of this aspect of C-18 has at least partially come to fruition.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"We're"? Are we all Google shareholders now?

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No I'm talking about the legislators. And you're right I shouldn't say "we're", because I never want to be associated with those crooked shit sacks.

Our legislators put all this effort into this, and half the population seems to support it now, but at the end of the day it's just another subsidy for the rich.

Just because the money doesn't come from taxpayers doesn't mean it's not a subsidy. The government spent time and effort to pass legislation that benefits the rich monetarily. That is a subsidy. That the money does not come from taxpayers is a detail they expounded on to win over public opinion, and it worked. People used to be against this.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
33 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7179 readers
299 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS