55
submitted 11 months ago by Acetamide@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

At first blush, this article seems to say that there's a solid hypothesis for which the math works consistently, and they know what they want to do in order to test that hypothesis. It's just a matter of designing and performing experiments.

But then, I read this:

[Co-author] Weller-Davies added: “A delicate interplay must exist if quantum particles such as atoms are able to bend classical spacetime. There must be a fundamental trade-off between the wave nature of atoms, and how large the random fluctuations in spacetime need to be.”

I know atoms aren't "particles," and I'm pretty damned sure they're also not quanta.

[-] anzich@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Atoms are composite particles. And they surely are quantum particles as you need quantum mechanics to describe their behavior

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
55 points (96.6% liked)

Science

13216 readers
57 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS