1257
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maeve@kbin.social -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At some point, we should simply allow children to be children. I’m not adverse to pre-k but I’m very adverse to conditioning them to work at ever*-earlier ages.

*edited

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

The children yearn for the mines, give them what they really want. Let's turn this into a 10 billion dollar profit.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

First they need basic infantry training so they can defend the classrooms, the bus loops, and the auditoriums.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Soviet school curriculum actually had a little bit of that. Well, how to tell ranks, what to do in case of war (also fire alarm or any other emergency), first aid, disassembly and assembly of the AK rifle, orientation on terrain and basic survival skills, not sure about actually firing at targets - I wasn't alive back then.

In our school (I was born in 1996) there was literally one time where our class was taken to a shooting range, but it was more like a tour. The got to shoot a few rounds at targets, yes. The first aid, ranks and AK disassembly\assembly parts I do remember.

There were war-themed games ("Zarnitsa" etc) teaching coordination, subordination, orientation, and of course using radio (to communicate and to intercept the other team's communications). EDIT: That I only heard about.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The US and UK called it Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, etc.

Germany had the Hitler Youth.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

I'm talking about the school program, not that.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Pre-mines. They spend a year in the mines as a learning experience ( unpaid internship) and then we send them off to school

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

i don't know what your pre-K was like, but i don't remember mine requiring the kids to punch a timeclock, earn wages, or to perform any actual labor. IIRC, we played with toys, played games, sang songs, engaged in educational activities for toddlers, ate snacks, and took naps.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago

It's a finger painting sweatshop.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Banksy will make millions off this one weird trick.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

If we had more funding for great teachers, it would be anything but pre-work. Ultimately, lower income families really benefit from free childcare schools provide, and a good pre-K classroom is all about play and exploring.

Teaching at that level should be fun for kids and teachers (though also exhausting). It's when underfunding forces teachers into a solid 8h of classroom time a day with a way too large class size that it turns work-like.

I freelanced music ed and worked with 4-8 year olds in several different schools. Some were amazing, supportive teaching assistants and reasonable schedules with a few breaks in my day, kids loved it and so did I. Others, I felt like a warden just trying to stop a riot for 9 hours straight with a 20min lunch. 25+ 4 year olds with no support doesn't work.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

What am amazing reply! I’m fully on board with fully funded, fully fun pre-k-12. I’d like to see it Montessori style, as well. Bring back recess, and for goodness’ sake, a full lunch hour.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Bruh what do you think pre-k is lol

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1257 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS