41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CJOtheReal@ani.social 1 points 11 months ago

You simply don't need so many people when you replace humanoid robots with actual robots...

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And what's the recompense for the ones who "aren't needed"? "Wish you luck, get out"? They're just supposed to make a not-nearly-enough unemployment check stretch because some shitbag C-suite deemed them unnecessary and/or not worth paying? The seemingly naively-optimistic IFLS angle on robotics is going to only exacerbate the "motherfuckers aren't hiring" crisis we're still living through.

[-] CJOtheReal@ani.social -1 points 11 months ago

I mean thats what happened when industry 2.0 and 3.0 happened as well. Now we are at 4.0 and need less people and higher skills.

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But what I'm saying is what we're living now is unsustainable without HEAVY changes to the way our society operates-- and you seem to just want to exacerbate that already existing crisis, and introduce us to a brand new one. Not all of us-- as a matter of fact, precious few of us-- have the capabilities, either liquid resource or intangible resource-wise, to actually upskill in the West.

[-] CJOtheReal@ani.social -1 points 11 months ago

Less people less unsustainablity.

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago
[-] CJOtheReal@ani.social -1 points 11 months ago

No. Im just telling the truth.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1801 readers
121 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS