748
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I agree that part was a non-sequitur. I even thought so myself when I first passed over it.

But the other part of the exchange is not confusing at all and there's zero indication that anyone thought she is actually on the hook for any damages. I'm more-so confused how you could not pick up the meaning even after a re-read.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude until your above comment I was confused as fuck.

Maybe I need more coffee.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

lol It happens. To your credit, most people wouldn't admit it.

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
748 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12539 readers
670 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS